separation of church and state. the laws of Christ that govern me as a believer. imposing those laws on others...or not. these are the three things that i can't seem to shake as i as i go back and forth on deciding which candidate to vote for. i have a degree in political science but for the first time
i'm finding myself trying to understand politics from a different perspective...who would Jesus want me to vote for?
it's not
surprising to most that Christians tend to vote conservatively, and i am a registered republican...but more often these days i find myself questioning if the laws
i'm held to as a believer should have me voting more along the left side of the isle.
lately it seems like "the church" hasn't been much more credible than wall street, the media or the politicians. Most of us profess his name but forget what he said (including myself)....here's a passage from a book
i'm reading "red letter
Christians" by tony
campolo:
"...when Jesus tells us that he will regard the way we treat the hungry, the homeless, the immigrant, the poor family, the sick and the prisoner as if we were treating Him that way, it likely means that He would not think ignoring them is good domestic policy. Or when He tells us to "love your enemies" and that "blesses are the peacemakers," it might be hard to persuade him to join "wars against terrorism" with so much "collateral damage" to civilians."
i'm still struggling with many issues even belonging in government (abortion among one), but since they are
i'm taking them in consideration as i muddle through all the rhetoric when deciding how to vote...nothing
i've heard or read about John McCain seems to align with what Jesus commands us to do. he and his running mate have said they're not for abortion or same-sex marriages...most would consider that the views of Jesus. i guess what i like about
Obama and his mate is that they seem to be for
tolerance....how do we as believers hold non-believers to the same
governance we are to follow? most of us seem to be forgetting about the
tolerance and love we're commanded to have for these people. we tell women they can't abort their pregnancies but when their babies are born we brand them with a
scarlet letter...there are other issues too, like homosexuality, in which we seem to be more intolerant rather than loving. don't get me wrong, for us, it is clear, but we have to remember that these folks don't know and believe the same way we do. how are they to come and know Jesus if all we show is
intolerance and
nonacceptance rather than love and compassion?
under the Bush administration more than $283 billion was cut from domestic programs in 2007...many of which assisted the elderly, the poor and our education systems. in the same administration we have spent 11 times that of China and 16 times more than Russia have spent on defense ($528 billion v. China's 49.5 billion and Russia's $34.7 billion) from tony
compallo's book...
"the prophet Isiah warned the ancient Jews not to trust in military might for their security. He said 'Alas for those who go down to Egypt for help and who rely on horses, who trust in chariots because they are many and in horsemen because they are very strong, but do not look to the Holy One of Israel or consult the Lord'"
i'm not disagreeing that there are "evil" people overseas we are fighting. sometimes i just wonder how different is "the church" when we hold non-believers to the rules that govern us. how different are we when we don't love and accept a mother struggling with the decision to carry out her pregnancy? how different are we when we don't allow a same-sex couple to visit in the hospital and have the same rights in death as we do for our spouses? the list goes on...i guess the point here is that the war isn't working. maybe it's time to try something new. something Jesus would agree with. good can overcome bad. good will prevail over evil - we are promised that. why not start here in our country?
i do believe that it is the church's responsibility to carry out what Jesus has governed us to do. i don't believe however that many church's are ready to take on the responsibility....and if church's aren't ready then i feel like my responsibility as a christian voter is to vote for the candidate i believe is most likely to take my tax dollars and care for the needy and the poor; who wants to give freedom and a better life to the immigrants who come to America for it; who wants to sit down with other leaders and make peace instead of resulting to war; who governs with tolerance instead of doctrine....which candidate is that?